HBO's Harry Potter Series: Reading the Tea Leaves
Key Takeaways
- HBO's upcoming Harry Potter series aims to move away from studio-bound sets by utilizing larger budgets for more natural, expansive world-building that mirrors the real muggle environment.
- The newly cast young actors—Dominic McLoughlin, Arabella Stanton, and Alistair Stout—exhibit a more relaxed and natural acting style from the start compared to the original film trio.
- Unlike the original films where the overarching plot remained a mystery, the new series operates with a complete story arc, giving creators and returning audiences a fundamentally different perspective on character trajectories.
- Rebooting beloved intellectual property successfully requires bold creative shifts, as demonstrated by J.J. Abrams' Star Trek films, rather than simply retreading old ground like the later Star Wars sequels.
- The involvement of television showrunners like Francesca Gardner and John Brown helps maintain structured narrative pacing across multiple seasons while managing the inevitable aging of the young cast.
In this bonus episode of Mythmakers, Julia Golding looks at the latest trailers and interviews for the upcoming HBO Harry Potter series, reading the tea leaves to consider what approach the creators may be taking. She then expands the discussion to other major fantasy and sci-fi reboots, from Star Trek to Star Wars.
When is it too soon to return to a beloved story? And could a Lord of the Rings series be made within the next decade?
00:00 Introduction: Welcome to Mythmakers and HBO's Harry Potter Series
02:11 First Impressions: Tonal Shifts and Natural Landscapes
03:12 The New Young Cast: A More Natural Performance
05:39 Knowing the Ending: A Different Creative Challenge
09:08 Expanding the Wizarding World: IP, Theme Parks, and Video Games
10:14 Why Remake Harry Potter? The Question of Necessity
11:59 The Creative Team: Television Writers Take the Helm
15:23 Lessons from Other Reboots: Star Trek's Success
18:59 When Reboots Fail: Star Wars and Retreading Old Ground
20:55 Looking Ahead: Could Lord of the Rings Be Next?
Website: https://centre4fantasy.com/website
Instagram: https://centre4fantasy.com/Instagram
Facebook: https://centre4fantasy.com/Facebook
TikTok: https://centre4fantasy.com/tiktok
Frequently Asked Questions
What is HBO's Harry Potter series approach compared to the original films?
HBO's adaptation utilizes a much larger budget to focus on natural landscapes, expansive set designs, and a more integrated muggle world, moving away from the controlled studio sets of the original films.
Who are the showrunners for HBO's Harry Potter series?
The series is led by showrunner Francesca Gardner, who is joined by co-showrunner John Brown to help manage the extensive writing workload for subsequent seasons.
How does knowing the complete ending change the new Harry Potter series?
Because the full seven-book arc is already known by both creators and the audience, performances and character choices—such as Papa Essiedu taking on the role of Snape—can be approached with a completely different emotional nuance from the beginning.
Why do major fantasy and sci-fi franchises get rebooted?
Reboots happen for strong financial reasons and to retell beloved stories on a grander canvas, though their creative success depends heavily on fresh writing and distinctive tonal shifts rather than exact imitation.
1
00:00:05.339 --> 00:00:07.182
Hello and welcome to Mythmakers.
2
00:00:07.603 --> 00:00:14.674
Mythmakers is the podcast for fantasy fans and fantasy creatives brought to you by the Oxford Centre for Fantasy.
3
00:00:15.355 --> 00:00:17.238
My name is Julia Golding.
4
00:00:17.914 --> 00:00:36.405
Now, have you been watching the growing, I suppose they're like tidbits and trail to get our appetites whetted for the new Harry Potter TV series, which HBO are creating with Warner Brothers, which will be coming out on Christmas Day?
5
00:00:38.666 --> 00:00:57.921
As someone who raised children during the initial run of the Harry Potter books and films, remembering the huge excitement that came with each publication of each book, plus the excitement of going to see the films as a family, I've been watching this with interest.
6
00:00:58.281 --> 00:00:59.322
In some ways, it's
7
00:00:59.922 --> 00:01:04.685
It seems very near, very quick for me that they have decided to do this.
8
00:01:04.745 --> 00:01:06.507
But then I'm reminded it's actually 25 years.
9
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:12.243
Well, not since the last one, but since the first one came out as a film.
10
00:01:12.984 --> 00:01:14.906
So that's a quarter of a century.
11
00:01:14.966 --> 00:01:19.029
So you can see why the decision has been made to do this.
12
00:01:20.010 --> 00:01:22.372
There is clearly a financial reason.
13
00:01:22.673 --> 00:01:23.794
It's going to be a winner.
14
00:01:23.974 --> 00:01:33.282
It's one of those properties which everybody will, well, not everybody, but a lot of people will go to because they already know it.
15
00:01:33.302 --> 00:01:35.164
It's similar in that way to...
16
00:01:35.704 --> 00:01:42.450
doing a Spider-Man film or a Lord of the Rings, you can assure a certain following.
17
00:01:43.791 --> 00:01:49.376
So what are the tea leaves telling us in Divination?
18
00:01:49.817 --> 00:02:00.226
Well, I think the latest trailer, which came out just a few days ago, is interesting because it seems to me there's an interesting shift.
19
00:02:00.246 --> 00:02:01.227
I don't know.
20
00:02:01.867 --> 00:02:07.916
The other things I'd been seeing about it felt like it was pretty similar to the original film.
21
00:02:07.996 --> 00:02:10.239
So that raised the question of why do it?
22
00:02:11.790 --> 00:02:26.803
I think there is a big tonal shift, which I've noticed, which is it does feel as though because they have a lot of money to spend on this, they can afford to move out of that feeling of it being in a studio and it feels like it's more in a natural world.
23
00:02:27.564 --> 00:02:36.632
So you'll have much more of a sense of the real muggle world, which you only glimpse from time to time in the films and the natural quality.
24
00:02:38.027 --> 00:02:43.770
world around Hogwarts will feel like, a bit more like it did in the first film when they were doing a lot of location filming.
25
00:02:44.250 --> 00:03:00.197
For all sorts of reasons, later in the series, they moved into studios where things were more controlled, like, for example, the forest, the old forest, as far as I can remember, was pretty much always a studio set, but it certainly felt like it.
26
00:03:01.277 --> 00:03:10.539
So I'm looking forward to seeing this step into actually making it feel as real as the world you imagine when you're reading the books.
27
00:03:12.027 --> 00:03:23.435
The other thing I've noticed, which I welcome, is that the children seem, from the little glimpses we're getting, to be from the get-go, acting more like children, more natural.
28
00:03:24.215 --> 00:03:40.427
There was a definite time of getting used to the craft of acting, which the original three actors, Rupert Grint, Emma Watson, and of course, Harry Potter himself, Daniel Radcliffe,
29
00:03:41.287 --> 00:03:52.857
So the new team of actors, that's Dominic McLoughlin, who is our Harry Potter, Arabella Stanton, Hermione Granger.
30
00:03:53.117 --> 00:03:58.341
She also plays the voice of the younger Hermione Granger in the full cast editions.
31
00:03:59.022 --> 00:04:00.843
So I feel as though I'm already quite used to her.
32
00:04:01.544 --> 00:04:03.946
And then Alistair Stout as Ron Weasley.
33
00:04:04.326 --> 00:04:07.028
By the way, his surname, Stout, seems such a Weasley name.
34
00:04:07.729 --> 00:04:09.491
You can see him already in the Wizarding World.
35
00:04:10.231 --> 00:04:18.398
Anyway, it seems fun that they are able to relax together more like children rather than delivering lines.
36
00:04:19.158 --> 00:04:26.544
I think that maybe they're choosing the best bits, but that is perhaps as a result of lessons learned.
37
00:04:26.644 --> 00:04:28.706
They saw what it took to get...
38
00:04:30.383 --> 00:04:33.184
the three in the cast who actually worked really well together, and they did.
39
00:04:33.804 --> 00:04:46.767
But admittedly, they all say that when they were first on the set of the first film way back at the beginning of the 2000s, they were all learning their craft.
40
00:04:47.707 --> 00:04:55.829
And it seems as though there's been some good, I suppose, training and relaxation techniques going on on set.
41
00:04:56.469 --> 00:04:59.050
Perhaps there's also the fact that they're now...
42
00:04:59.570 --> 00:05:03.334
setting it up so the young people are living together in a school situation.
43
00:05:04.115 --> 00:05:08.018
So there'll be a very interesting, make a good book, wouldn't it?
44
00:05:08.038 --> 00:05:18.368
The kind of school within the magic school, the real school and the magic school dynamics going on, which I'm sure will come out in the making of and later exposes.
45
00:05:18.829 --> 00:05:23.253
Anyway, I'm really hoping that Dominic Arabella and Alistair are...
46
00:05:23.733 --> 00:05:33.665
able to grow up, secure and learn their craft, but they seem to be making a good start and let's hope the press leaves them alone and let them just be actors.
47
00:05:34.365 --> 00:05:36.808
Anyway, so I'm encouraged by the way the
48
00:05:39.031 --> 00:05:41.674
But there is something really interesting going on as well, isn't there?
49
00:05:41.694 --> 00:05:53.687
Which is, if you remember, those of you who are around, when we were following the books and the films, we didn't know what was going to happen to Snape.
50
00:05:53.928 --> 00:05:55.509
You may have had your pet theories.
51
00:05:56.931 --> 00:05:59.334
You didn't know what was going to happen to Fred and George Weasley.
52
00:06:00.487 --> 00:06:08.791
You knew that some people might die because J.K. Rowling didn't shy away from killing off characters like Cedric Diggory.
53
00:06:09.912 --> 00:06:10.892
But you didn't know who.
54
00:06:11.452 --> 00:06:14.474
This time, the full story arc is complete.
55
00:06:14.574 --> 00:06:15.794
We know what's going to happen.
56
00:06:17.395 --> 00:06:23.378
And I saw an interview with David Heyman on the Harry Potter podcast run by HBO.
57
00:06:23.798 --> 00:06:27.240
But he points out that it's a very different experience this time.
58
00:06:28.664 --> 00:06:32.245
Even when he was making... David Heyman is the producer.
59
00:06:32.745 --> 00:06:35.726
He's also the man behind such things as Paddington.
60
00:06:36.567 --> 00:06:41.848
I think he's also involved somewhere in James Bond, so that guy is getting around quite a bit.
61
00:06:42.108 --> 00:06:50.051
But he is an extremely good and sound British producer with a real good grasp of Britishness of the piece.
62
00:06:50.331 --> 00:06:53.852
Anyway, he was saying that knowing that
63
00:06:55.162 --> 00:06:58.385
the fate of the characters means it's a very different experience for him.
64
00:06:59.606 --> 00:07:04.289
And of course, the audience, the grown-up audience, will know as well.
65
00:07:05.290 --> 00:07:13.837
So they're going to have to think how that changes performances and the choice of how they show performance.
66
00:07:15.388 --> 00:07:16.729
Snape as they go along.
67
00:07:16.950 --> 00:07:24.817
Snape is played by Papa Esedew, who of course is a black actor.
68
00:07:25.197 --> 00:07:31.944
So it's going to already be a good sort of shift away from what you think of the wonderful Alan Rickman.
69
00:07:32.484 --> 00:07:38.390
I think that's a good choice because whereas some other actors seem to be physically within a similar level.
70
00:07:40.595 --> 00:07:40.996
group.
71
00:07:41.716 --> 00:07:54.942
So for example, I would say that Nick Frost as Rubis Hagrid isn't a million miles away from Robbie Coltrane, another very beloved actor who has left us.
72
00:07:55.802 --> 00:08:05.907
I think it's a good idea to shift Snape character because I think it will add a new, more youthful Snape that we're going
73
00:08:07.937 --> 00:08:12.681
Anyway, I'm sort of okay with all of that because I think you need to shake it out.
74
00:08:12.701 --> 00:08:19.146
But I'd actually be in favor, this is really what I'm talking about here, in favor of big changes happening.
75
00:08:19.926 --> 00:08:22.628
Because otherwise, you might as well just go and watch the original films.
76
00:08:23.569 --> 00:08:38.816
Clearly, the visuals follow the same whimsy of the films, the kind of world that Chris Columbus established for the first film, which has followed through the various iterations of directors.
77
00:08:40.377 --> 00:08:44.300
But what they seem to have done this time is they know that they have a very big budget.
78
00:08:44.660 --> 00:08:46.201
So everything is expanded.
79
00:08:46.221 --> 00:08:48.243
The details are bigger.
80
00:08:48.263 --> 00:08:56.069
It reminds me a bit more of the design ethic that Peter Jackson brought to the Lord of the Rings film, that places now are contiguous.
81
00:08:56.109 --> 00:08:57.370
They connect to each other.
82
00:08:57.990 --> 00:09:01.012
Diagon Alley has less of a set feel.
83
00:09:01.032 --> 00:09:01.252
Yeah.
84
00:09:02.253 --> 00:09:05.995
It feels more of a street in London, the back streets of London somewhere.
85
00:09:06.695 --> 00:09:08.456
So I think that will be very pleasing.
86
00:09:08.996 --> 00:09:16.480
Of course, it is all part of this big money-making machine that is now Harry Potter, because many of you will have gone to the various Harry Potter worlds.
87
00:09:18.018 --> 00:09:34.687
So there is a weird connection going on where that experience of people walking down streets that are pretending to be Diagon Alley, it feeds into what goes into the film and the film will feed back into that, no doubt, in future.
88
00:09:36.067 --> 00:09:37.108
And on that theme.
89
00:09:38.796 --> 00:09:50.345
There is creatures being brought into this particular world that are from the video game aspect of Harry Potter that aren't in the books.
90
00:09:50.685 --> 00:09:57.190
So the J.K. Rowling world, the wizarding world has expanded into, well, obviously it's also a Broadway show.
91
00:09:57.630 --> 00:10:07.558
So there is this thing where other factors are feeding into how they make the choices linked to the whole big world
92
00:10:08.338 --> 00:10:13.441
IP universe that they have, which is fascinating to watch happening.
93
00:10:14.582 --> 00:10:24.628
The big question that this asks really is, when you've got something pretty decent already, so you've got, is it eight films?
94
00:10:25.458 --> 00:10:27.400
Yeah, it is, isn't it?
95
00:10:27.420 --> 00:10:28.421
Because the last one's in two.
96
00:10:28.982 --> 00:10:37.570
When you've got eight decent films and you've got good performances, not too bad CGI, I know they can always improve it.
97
00:10:38.291 --> 00:10:41.934
What is the point of remaking within this quarter of a century?
98
00:10:42.375 --> 00:10:46.439
Well, everybody still can watch with enjoyment the films.
99
00:10:47.140 --> 00:10:48.601
Now, everybody is saying that
100
00:10:49.962 --> 00:10:53.203
It's allowing other parts of the book to come in.
101
00:10:54.323 --> 00:11:03.786
So you can expand to things like Peeves, the poltergeist, spend longer with Harry in the muggle world when he goes to a school.
102
00:11:03.826 --> 00:11:06.686
You can see that in one of the trailers, so an ordinary school.
103
00:11:08.567 --> 00:11:09.547
All those things are
104
00:11:11.203 --> 00:11:18.006
They can play around with making it feel more like a period piece, so leaning into the early 90s setting.
105
00:11:18.026 --> 00:11:21.708
There's lots of fun things they can do, but do you actually need to do it?
106
00:11:22.849 --> 00:11:29.452
It's the same sort of question you will get when someone says, oh, let's remake the Lord of the Rings films.
107
00:11:29.892 --> 00:11:31.533
And lots of people will say, no, they can't.
108
00:11:31.553 --> 00:11:33.934
You know, Peter Jackson did such a great job.
109
00:11:33.974 --> 00:11:34.795
They shouldn't do it again.
110
00:11:35.535 --> 00:11:44.129
Here we've got an example of the same studios, same people being involved in making something, repainting it on a bigger canvas.
111
00:11:45.171 --> 00:11:49.698
So whether or not it turns out to be a good idea, it will certainly be financially a good idea.
112
00:11:51.239 --> 00:11:57.802
But whether or not the actual content is good is going to be down to the writing.
113
00:11:59.203 --> 00:12:08.967
And the creator of this particular iteration is Francesca Gardner, who is acting as the showrunner.
114
00:12:11.047 --> 00:12:17.510
And she's also working with John Brown, another showrunner.
115
00:12:18.443 --> 00:12:33.191
And it seems that John Brown was elevated to a co-showrunner so that poor old Francesca Gardner could actually have some help managing the workload.
116
00:12:34.232 --> 00:12:34.572
So...
117
00:12:35.452 --> 00:12:38.754
for season two, there'll be two of them, which follows, doesn't it?
118
00:12:38.794 --> 00:12:48.017
Because if they're trying to do a story in pacing it with the children growing up, they can't take 18 months off between seasons.
119
00:12:48.037 --> 00:12:51.659
They've got to keep on going or else their actors will age out.
120
00:12:52.359 --> 00:12:55.521
So obviously they can go on a little bit longer than the...
121
00:12:55.841 --> 00:12:58.142
They can catch up with their ages and still be...
122
00:12:59.222 --> 00:13:04.267
have a few years to play with in hand, but still, they can't leave it for too long.
123
00:13:04.387 --> 00:13:12.634
So that's why we've got a second writer as a showrunner, entering the frame for the second season.
124
00:13:14.333 --> 00:13:18.095
So it's got these two writers behind it.
125
00:13:19.375 --> 00:13:26.879
Just the line-up is that eight episodes are written by Francesca and John is involved on one.
126
00:13:27.699 --> 00:13:31.061
And the director is Mark Milod.
127
00:13:31.101 --> 00:13:35.423
So these are people who have come from the world of television.
128
00:13:36.644 --> 00:13:38.205
I believe they've worked on Succession.
129
00:13:39.585 --> 00:13:47.533
So you need to have a television writer as opposed to a film writer in order to control the story arcs.
130
00:13:47.573 --> 00:13:48.695
It's a huge challenge.
131
00:13:48.735 --> 00:13:53.159
I mean, J.K. Rowling has basically done the job for you in many ways.
132
00:13:53.359 --> 00:13:55.081
She has shown you what the...
133
00:13:56.662 --> 00:14:02.846
seven book story arc is, but she also has provided story arcs within each book.
134
00:14:02.866 --> 00:14:22.617
So that has made their job a lot easier having that behind them, but still within that, they have to make selection of which ones they follow, which were, cause still even within what seems a much more expansive nine episode season, even within that,
135
00:14:24.218 --> 00:14:26.099
is still going to be things that they can't show.
136
00:14:27.160 --> 00:14:35.966
That's why you'll never really get rid of books because books have so much more nuance in them that just can't be shown on the screen.
137
00:14:36.886 --> 00:14:39.548
The choice of those two writers is encouraging.
138
00:14:40.169 --> 00:14:42.010
I really am rooting for them.
139
00:14:42.270 --> 00:14:45.833
I hope that they make a big success of it.
140
00:14:46.714 --> 00:14:50.543
But when I was thinking about, well, what do I feel about this?
141
00:14:50.663 --> 00:14:52.508
Am I going to sit there and watch it again?
142
00:14:52.829 --> 00:14:53.571
Yes, of course I am.
143
00:14:55.245 --> 00:14:56.326
just to see what they've done.
144
00:14:56.586 --> 00:15:04.933
It's like watching someone produce a puzzle and solving it, the puzzle, or playing chess.
145
00:15:05.013 --> 00:15:06.154
Chess is the same game.
146
00:15:07.295 --> 00:15:10.177
The structure is the same game, but it's played in so many different ways.
147
00:15:10.217 --> 00:15:14.801
So you don't say, oh, I've seen Hamlet once, I'm never going to go and see it again.
148
00:15:15.701 --> 00:15:18.244
You want to go and see it again with somebody else interpreting it.
149
00:15:18.284 --> 00:15:21.726
So I think, you know, that's what's happening here.
150
00:15:23.047 --> 00:15:28.152
And it reminded me of some of the returns to big IPs that I've seen.
151
00:15:28.592 --> 00:15:33.997
So the one big success is, for me, was Star Trek.
152
00:15:34.017 --> 00:15:36.499
So the reboot has gone the other way.
153
00:15:36.619 --> 00:15:39.922
So if you think about it, it started with...
154
00:15:40.502 --> 00:15:51.454
The TV series, there were films that spun out of the TV series, but they were already later versions of the crew had already existed.
155
00:15:51.995 --> 00:15:56.200
And so the original, and then the next generation and so on.
156
00:15:57.161 --> 00:16:00.264
So the other way round, the TV series led to films.
157
00:16:01.305 --> 00:16:27.367
But then you had the reboot films, which were directed by J.J. Abrams, which did the origin story with Chris Pine as Captain Kirk and Zachary Quinto as Spock and Simon Pegg as Scotty and Zoe Saldana as Uhura.
158
00:16:28.628 --> 00:16:36.034
And of course, Carl Urban as McCoy, also probably best known to this audience as Aema.
159
00:16:36.894 --> 00:16:38.015
I thought those really worked.
160
00:16:39.016 --> 00:16:50.305
There was a gloss and a flash to that reimagining, particularly, I mean, literally, because one of J.J. Abrams, a little t-shirt.
161
00:16:50.525 --> 00:17:18.775
ticks or these lens flares he uses all the time can get a bit annoying but it did suit the star trek world so if you think of the original sort of early color tv version they did their best with the technology they had with them but actually seeing that reimagined in what to us is the current state of how we imagine sci-fi was fresh and fitted the material
162
00:17:19.815 --> 00:17:36.764
But particularly pleasing was that they had picked up the development of the relationships, the Kirk-Spock antagonism friendship, the cynical McCoy, the
163
00:17:38.764 --> 00:17:42.768
sort of chirpy, joking Scotty.
164
00:17:42.788 --> 00:17:51.977
They sort of worked out what everyone liked about those characters and they were able to synthesize and sort of crystallize what made those work and put them into the film.
165
00:17:52.877 --> 00:18:02.146
Of course, giving Uhura more of an active role rather than the sort of limited role that her predecessor was given.
166
00:18:03.635 --> 00:18:10.817
And so I really enjoyed seeing those and I wasn't at all worried that they had gone back maybe more than 25 years had passed.
167
00:18:10.957 --> 00:18:14.518
It felt the right timing to retell those stories.
168
00:18:14.878 --> 00:18:16.119
I'd quite like them to do a bit more.
169
00:18:16.299 --> 00:18:17.539
I really enjoyed those films.
170
00:18:18.299 --> 00:18:24.301
Whereas another IP that went back to revisit itself was the Star Wars one.
171
00:18:25.341 --> 00:18:29.963
And I found the later trilogies very disappointing.
172
00:18:30.843 --> 00:18:31.023
The
173
00:18:32.433 --> 00:18:45.804
the ones that are episodes one, two, and three, they were digging out new stories, but the writing was famously quite terrible.
174
00:18:46.845 --> 00:18:58.955
The one which I'm really thinking about is episode, where are we, seven, which was Star Wars Episode VII, The Force Awakens, which came out in 2015 with Daisy Ridley as Rey.
175
00:18:59.695 --> 00:19:10.728
The problem I had with that was as I was sitting there watching it, I realized that they were doing the first film.
176
00:19:11.589 --> 00:19:15.253
I mean, the original film number, uh,
177
00:19:16.653 --> 00:19:22.716
the original Star Wars, Luke Skywalker, but just making Rey into Luke.
178
00:19:23.296 --> 00:19:29.800
So much so that you had pretty much the same end moves with destroying the Death Star.
179
00:19:30.400 --> 00:19:31.881
And I couldn't believe it.
180
00:19:32.521 --> 00:19:33.922
I thought, this is such...
181
00:19:34.952 --> 00:19:36.433
unimaginative storytelling.
182
00:19:36.473 --> 00:19:46.879
You've got so many wonderful possibilities here, but you've decided to retread what you knew worked without admitting to it.
183
00:19:47.639 --> 00:19:55.884
So it is more honest in the Harry Potter reboot series that we know they're telling the same story.
184
00:19:56.945 --> 00:20:00.187
And it's only when Star Wars goes away
185
00:20:00.987 --> 00:20:06.033
from trying to play its greatest hits that it gets for me interesting again.
186
00:20:06.154 --> 00:20:13.002
So like Andor, for example, that kind of storytelling is saying, well, what else can we do with this?
187
00:20:14.686 --> 00:20:17.947
Of course, with Harry Potter, they have tried the what else can we do with this?
188
00:20:18.468 --> 00:20:23.830
And they tried it with the Fantastic Beasts sort of franchise, which hasn't quite worked.
189
00:20:24.910 --> 00:20:28.972
And the mistake I think they made there is they took it away from children.
190
00:20:29.432 --> 00:20:42.038
I think Harry Potter needs to stay in the hands of children and teenagers to work in the same way as Star Trek needs to stay in the hands of children.
191
00:20:42.558 --> 00:20:53.821
ship's crew in the same way as Star Wars needs to stay in the hands of the rebellion, but it needs to do new things with those stories.
192
00:20:55.121 --> 00:21:09.284
So the question that I suppose I'm pondering is, what would happen if, and I'm sure this conversation is happening somewhere, what would happen if there was a TV series of Lord of the Rings?
193
00:21:10.265 --> 00:21:11.905
So we've got three excellent films,
194
00:21:13.985 --> 00:21:24.934
We've got two interstitial, we've got this Andy Serkis one, which is the hunt for Gollum.
195
00:21:25.354 --> 00:21:30.438
We've got the one that's might be fitting in between.
196
00:21:32.247 --> 00:21:40.392
Leaving the Shire and Arriving at Bree, that one, which is mainly Tom Bombadil and Barrow rights, with some connection to what happens afterwards.
197
00:21:40.813 --> 00:21:51.419
And potentially another film after that, after the events at the end, the sort of what happens after the credits.
198
00:21:52.760 --> 00:21:55.082
So that might be the way it's being handled.
199
00:21:55.122 --> 00:21:58.864
But I bet someone there is thinking, let's make a TV series of it.
200
00:22:00.828 --> 00:22:08.858
And Harry Potter have done this by keeping it within the hands of the same creative team.
201
00:22:10.100 --> 00:22:13.043
Star Trek did it by finding...
202
00:22:14.795 --> 00:22:18.477
a new generation of director to take it on.
203
00:22:20.018 --> 00:22:25.720
And I guess the question would be, what would be the most worth it?
204
00:22:26.261 --> 00:22:35.185
It could be that these extra films are going to do the same job, that you'll be able to sit there and imagine, well, you would start with The Hobbit.
205
00:22:35.205 --> 00:22:41.208
You would start watching it like a TV series and you could segment it up that way, I guess.
206
00:22:43.183 --> 00:22:44.865
But there's going to be somebody wanting to do it.
207
00:22:45.866 --> 00:22:53.453
And it'll be fascinating to see what happens in the next 10 years on that front.
208
00:22:54.574 --> 00:23:05.404
I think the weight would be for it to stay in the sort of Peter Jackson world because he has created so much of what we expect it to look like.
209
00:23:05.624 --> 00:23:06.364
But you never know.
210
00:23:07.906 --> 00:23:09.147
We'll see what happens next.
211
00:23:10.665 --> 00:23:13.831
I suppose the big question is, would it be fun to watch?
212
00:23:14.572 --> 00:23:15.815
Would we learn anything new?
213
00:23:17.088 --> 00:23:24.892
So going back to Harry Potter, I think I am excited by the series, excited to see what they do with it.
214
00:23:25.633 --> 00:23:36.459
And I'm certainly wishing them all luck because it'd be fun to have some new entry into the big fantasy IPs that really gets global success.
215
00:23:36.499 --> 00:23:43.103
Because something like that means there is more money, more investment coming into creating other things.
216
00:23:44.304 --> 00:23:45.005
other stories.
217
00:23:45.045 --> 00:23:48.008
So let's hope that means it is a success.
218
00:23:48.949 --> 00:23:50.431
Anyway, thank you very much for listening.
219
00:23:56.086 --> 00:23:58.667
Thanks for listening to MythMakers Podcast.
220
00:23:59.407 --> 00:24:02.168
Brought to you by the Oxford Centre for Fantasy.
221
00:24:02.828 --> 00:24:06.589
Visit OxfordCentreForFantasy.org to join in the fun.
222
00:24:07.289 --> 00:24:14.210
Find out about our online courses, In Person Stays in Oxford, plus visit our shop for great gifts.
223
00:24:14.931 --> 00:24:20.252
Tell a friend and subscribe wherever you find your favourite podcasts worldwide.
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Spotify
JioSaavn
Castro